Prehliadanie podľa Autor "Klimek, Libor"

Teraz sa zobrazuje 1 - 2 z 2
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Artificial intelligence in European criminal law perspective
    (Universum Press : Priština, 2024) Klimek, Libor; Babony, Dean
    Many official documents on artificial intelligence (AI) have been adopted by the European Union. The contribution deals with AI in European criminal law perspective. It focuses on the most important steps of the European Union in this field, namely the Directive 2016/680 on Protection of Personal Data Used by Police and Criminal Justice Authorities of 2016, the European Ethical Charter on the Use of AI in Judicial Systems of 2018, the Resolution on AI in Criminal Law and its Use in Criminal Matters of 2021 and the Proposal for a Regulation on Harmonised Rules on AI (AI Act) of 2021.
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Special prosecutor's offices and their position in a state governed by the rule of law: Is the abolition of office of special prosecution in Slovakia unconstitutional?
    (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute : Basel, 2025) Klimek, Libor; Šramel, Bystrík
    The specialization of public prosecution offices has been a growing international trend, particularly in addressing complex forms of crime such as corruption, economic crime, and organized crime. Many countries have established specialized prosecution bodies to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of law enforcement in these areas. However, Slovakia has recently taken a different approach by abolishing its Office of the Special Prosecution, a decision that contrasts sharply with prevailing global tendencies. This paper explores the reasons behind this shift, analyzing the political and legal arguments presented by both proponents and opponents of the abolition. The paper examines whether this move aligns with the rule of law and international legal obligations and considers its potential consequences for the effectiveness of criminal justice in Slovakia. While the paper is based on legal principles and comparative methods, it acknowledges the inherently political nature of decisions concerning the structure of prosecution services.