Taliga, Miloš2026-06-012026-06-0120260120-46882389-9387https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.vi63.14704https://repo.umb.sk/handle/123456789/1492In: Praxis Filosófica. Santiago de Cali : Universidad del Valle, 2026. ISSN 0120-4688. No. 63 (2026), pp. [1-13].In his paper, Armando Cíntora (2024) argues that the notion of criticizability, I proposed in my paper (Taliga, 2022) to show that critical rationalism can be comprehensive and non-paradoxical at the same time, faces the challenge of relativism. In this reply, I shall first summarize the notion of criticizability and Cíntora’s objection to it (Section II), then I shall argue that creationists or flat-earthers introduced by Cíntora (2024) do not do criticism, but fake criticism (Section III), and, finally, I shall explain why, and how, that blocks Cíntora’s charge of comprehensively critical rationalism from relativism (Section IV).enCC BY-NC-SA Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0. Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesskritický racionalizmushodnotyvaluesrelativizmuskritikacriticismArticle