Galasová, MiroslavaHeinzová, Zuzana2025-12-192025-12-192025978-80-86174-25-9https://www.spao.eu/index.php?menuid=3https://repo.umb.sk/handle/123456789/1158In: Sociální procesy a osobnost 2024 = Social processes and personality 2024 : proceedings of the 24th international conference : sborník příspěvků z 24. mezinárodní konference / rec. Matúš Adamkovič, Magdalena Adamus ... [et al.]. 1. vyd. Brno : Psychologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky, 2025. ISBN 978-80-86174-25-9. S. 58-65.Emotion regulation and stress coping are similar yet distinct concepts (Gross, 2009). Emotion regulation primarily focuses on managing present emotions, while coping encompasses broader strategies targeting stress management. In the cross-sectional study, we examined relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) (CERQ, Garnefski et al., 2001) and coping strategies (SVF 78, Janke & Erdmann, 2003) in a Slovak sample (N = 97; Mage = 38,3; SDage = 10,9). Overall, adaptive CERS positively correlated with nearly all positive coping strategies, except guilt denial, substitutional satisfaction, and need for social support, and negatively correlated with self-blame and resignation. Less adaptive CERS, in general, did not correlate with positive coping strategies but positively correlated with all negative coping strategies. Linear regression results suggested that both adaptive and less adaptive CERS significantly predicted negative coping strategies, while adaptive ER strategies also significantly predicted positive coping strategies. Our findings indicate a potential for increasing coping effectiveness in challenging situations through adaptive CERS.skCC BY-NC-ND Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0. Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessemočná reguláciaregulácia emóciíemocionálna reguláciaemotion regulationstratégie zvládania záťažecopingové stratégiecoping strategiesArticle