Prehliadanie podľa Autor "Cepko, Jaroslav"

Teraz sa zobrazuje 1 - 3 z 3
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Komentáre k vybraným zlomkom Eukleida z Megár
    (Filozofický ústav Slovenskej akadémie vied : Bratislava, 2025) Kalaš, Andrej; Cepko, Jaroslav; Suvák, Vladislav
    Selected fragments of Euclid of Megara concentrate on the testimonies that modern historians consider important for our efforts to reconstruct the early phase of the so-called Megarian Socratic school. Three of the fragments in this selection come from the doxographer Diogenes Laertius, who takes them from earlier Peripatetic and Alexandrian sources (fragments SSR II A 30, SSR II A 32, and SSR II A 34, according to Giannantoni’s edition); the fourth fragment comes from Cicero (SSR II A 31). The main method in the interpretation of the fragments is a hermeneutical reading of the text and the context, based on linguistic analysis and comparison of the various theses attributed to Euclid with the corpus of Socratic literature as well as with Hellenistic philosophy. The purpose of this paper is not to provide an interpretation of the fragments, but to review the basic strategies of modern historians in interpreting these testimonies, so that the reader can get a comprehensive picture of how the fragments have been interpreted in the last two centuries.
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Poznanie a cnosť v Sókratovskej literatúre
    (Belianum UMB, 2021) Cepko, Jaroslav
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Stilpón z Megár medzi sokratikou a helenizmom
    (Filozofický ústav Slovenskej akadémie vied : Bratislava, 2025) Cepko, Jaroslav
    Ancient sources depict the so-called Megarian school in two seemingly contrasting ways: on the one hand, as eristic and dialectic, and on the other, as a continuation of the Socratic ethical orientation in philosophy. The figure of Stilpo of Megara serves as an outstanding example of how these two aspects complement and condition one another. This study focuses on the analysis of selected fragments, specifically Stilpo’s critique of non-tautological predication, as well as his response to criticisms concerning the immoral behavior of his daughter. Both cases are based on the premise that it is impossible to predicate “one thing of another.” Stilpo’s dialectical strategies, which challenge certain ontological and linguistic assumptions, thus also functioned as ethical exercises aimed at achieving inner stability. It makes him a bridge between Socratic inquiry and Stoic and Pyrrhonian philosophy and a key figure in the transition to the Hellenistic period.