06 Príspevky v zborníkoch

Trvalé URI pre túto kolekciu

hdl:123456789/62

Prehliadať

Prehliadanie 06 Príspevky v zborníkoch podľa Autor "Heinzová, Zuzana"

Teraz sa zobrazuje 1 - 4 z 4
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Patterns of involvement and motivation in Slovak volunteer response to the Ukraine war: Findings from a national survey
    (European Research Network on Philanthropy : Heidelberg, 2026) Brozmanová Gregorová, Alžbeta; Heinzová, Zuzana; Frgelcová, Estera
    The swift humanitarian crisis caused by the conflict in Ukraine triggered an unprecedented wave of volunteerism across Europe. Due to its geographical proximity and historical ties, Slovakia became a crucial hub for support (Brozmanová Gregorová and Bambúch, 2024). Sharing a border with Ukraine, the country faced a significant influx of refugees, mainly women, children, and older adults seeking safety (Vansač and Gulasova, 2023). The initial response was marked by spontaneous help from ordinary citizens, demonstrating compassion and solidarity (Adamus and Grežo, 2024). Volunteers played a pivotal role in both humanitarian assistance and refugee integration. This study examines the multifaceted aspects of volunteerism during the early stages of the war, focusing on volunteers' demographic characteristics, levels of involvement, and motivations for engagement. Empirical data were collected in 2023 through a representative survey of the adult population as part of the project Volunteering in Slovakia during the crisis, with a research sample of 1,020 respondents. Findings show that 20.7% of adults volunteered to help address the crisis. Most were engaged in informal volunteering. Factor analysis revealed two main motivational patterns: value-based motivation and reactive or pragmatic motivation. Understanding these motives is crucial for sustaining volunteer engagement, especially in prolonged crises where initial enthusiasm may decline (Sengupta et al., 2023). Volunteering during the Ukraine crisis was strongly linked to volunteering in 2023 and to future intentions. This suggests that crisis-related volunteering can evolve into long-term engagement (Baxter-Tomkins and Wallace, 2009), thereby strengthening community cohesion and resilience (Waldman et al., 2018).
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    The Situational Test of Emotion Flexibility (STEF): Criterion validity pilot verification in relation to well-being and self-esteem
    (Psychologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky : Brno, 2025) Pilárik, Ľubor; Pšiteková, Viktória; Glázerová, Simona; Virostková Nábělková, Eva; Kaliská, Lada; Heinzová, Zuzana
    Stratégie regulácie emócií sú overované z hľadiska ich adaptívnej a maladaptívnej roly v psychickom zdraví. V poslednej dekáde sa časť záujmu presúva k skúmaniu flexibility používania rôznych stratégií regulácie emócií. Možnosti merania flexibility emočnej regulácie sú výrazne obmedzené vzhľadom na absenciu nástrojov, prípadne ich dotazníkový charakter. Situačný test emočnej flexibility (STEF) je novovytváraný merací nástroj zameriavajúci sa na meranie šiestich stratégií emočnej regulácie, situačnej flexibility expresie emócií a adaptívneho repertoáru stratégií pri regulácii negatívnych emócií. Príspevok prezentuje výsledky overovania kriteriálnej validity STEF na dvoch vzorkách vysokoškolských študentov (N = 340) vo vzťahu k sebaúčinnosti, sebaúcte, psychologickej a subjektívnej pohode. Korelačnou analýzou bolo zistené, že stratégia kognitívneho prehodnocovania ako i adaptívny repertoár stratégií pozitívne súviseli so sebaúčinnosťou, sebaúctou, určitými aspektami psychologickej pohody a prežívaním pozitívnych emócií. Naopak, stratégia ruminácie negatívne súvisela so sebaúctou, niektorými aspektami psychologickej pohody a pozitívne s prežívaním negatívnych emócií. Výsledky podporujú kriteriálnu validitu STEF. Emotion regulation strategies have been verified in terms of their adaptive and maladaptive roles in mental health. In last decade the focus has changed to examine the flexibility of different emotion regulation strategies usage. Opportunities to measure flexibility in emotion regulation are limited due to the absence of instruments, especially their questionnaire nature. The Situational Test of Emotion Flexibility (STEF) is a newly developed instrument measuring six emotion regulation strategies, situational flexibility of emotion expression, and the adaptive repertoire of strategies for regulating negative emotions. This article presents the results of the STEF criterion validation with two samples of undergraduate students (N = 340) in relation to self-efficacy, self-esteem, psychological and subjective well-being. Correlation analyses revealed the cognitive reappraisal strategy and the adaptive repertoire of strategies were positively related to self-efficacy, self-esteem, certain aspects of psychological well-being, and the experience of positive emotions. In contrast, the rumination strategy was negatively associated with self-esteem and some aspects of psychological well-being and positively related to experiencing negative emotions. The results support the criterion validity of the STEF.
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    The situational test of emotional flexibility: The expert's consensus on the emotion regulation strategy effectiveness
    (inScience Press : Lisabon, 2024) Pilárik, Ľubor; Virostková Nábělková, Eva; Heinzová, Zuzana; Kaliská, Lada
    The ability to effectively regulate emotions has emerged as an important protective factor for mental health. Current research provides insights into the maladaptive/adaptive nature of the selected emotion regulation strategies (e.g., cognitive reappraisal, suppression of emotion expression). The ambiguity of these findings suggests a protective factor of mental health may be an individual's ability to flexibly use different emotion regulation strategies depending on the situation evoking this emotion. However, measuring the flexibility of emotion regulation strategies is problematic due to the lack of measurements. The Situational Test of Emotional Flexibility (STEF) was created by the authors of the study, containing twelve pairs of situation scenarios eliciting three negative emotions (fear, sadness, and anger). Each pair of scenarios takes place in the same situation, changing only one aspect of the situation (e.g., the presence of other people). Participants are asked to consider six emotion regulation strategy effectiveness (acceptance, cognitive reappraisal, rumination, expression of emotion, ignoring, self-compassion) to regulate the evoked emotion for each scenario. STEF allows the assessment of the emotion regulation strategy flexibility in each scenario and also the assessment of the preferred emotion regulation strategy. This paper presents the results of an expert consensus on the effectiveness of six emotion regulation strategies via 24 scenarios. The research sample consisted of 19 experts (4 psychotherapists, 10 counselling/school psychologists, and 5 clinical psychologists) requiring at least five years of practice (M = 11.4 years) who assessed the effectiveness of using six emotion regulation strategies in 24 scenarios evoking fear, sadness, and anger. The results show that from the experts' perspective, self-compassion, expression of emotion, and cognitive reappraisal were the most effective emotion regulation strategies for all negative emotions. Ignoring emotion and rumination were the least effective strategies for all of them. The rank order of the effectiveness of the strategies showed slight differences separately for each emotion: anger, sadness, and fear. We discuss the results regarding the adaptive nature of emotion regulation strategies.
  • Obrázok miniatúry
    Položka
    Vzťahy medzi stratégiami emocionálnej regulácie a stratégiami zvládania
    (Psychologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky : Brno, 2025) Galasová, Miroslava; Heinzová, Zuzana
    Emotion regulation and stress coping are similar yet distinct concepts (Gross, 2009). Emotion regulation primarily focuses on managing present emotions, while coping encompasses broader strategies targeting stress management. In the cross-sectional study, we examined relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) (CERQ, Garnefski et al., 2001) and coping strategies (SVF 78, Janke & Erdmann, 2003) in a Slovak sample (N = 97; Mage = 38,3; SDage = 10,9). Overall, adaptive CERS positively correlated with nearly all positive coping strategies, except guilt denial, substitutional satisfaction, and need for social support, and negatively correlated with self-blame and resignation. Less adaptive CERS, in general, did not correlate with positive coping strategies but positively correlated with all negative coping strategies. Linear regression results suggested that both adaptive and less adaptive CERS significantly predicted negative coping strategies, while adaptive ER strategies also significantly predicted positive coping strategies. Our findings indicate a potential for increasing coping effectiveness in challenging situations through adaptive CERS.